Swingo ergo sum.
tuirgin: I watched Branford Marsalis and his band do Coltrane's A Love
Supreme. From the time it started I was weepy. I was literally choking
back sobs and had that clenched throat thing going—I was sucking
it back because my dad was watching it with me. I had to do that
throughout the whole 50 minutes.
tuirgin: Branford ain't Coltrane, but he did a fine, fine job of it.
tuirgin: I want to watch it again with an empty house so I can crank
it up, close my eyes and let it all flood through me.
shishno2: Wow!
shishno2: Jazz really says something to you.
tuirgin:
I was at the top of the Grand Hotel in Chicago (on tour
1987) listening to 'a Love Supreme' and learning the lesson of a
lifetime. Earlier i had been watching televangelists remake God in
their own image: tiny, petty and greedy. I knew from my earliest
memories that the world was winding in a direction away from love, and
I too was caught in it's drag.
There is so much wickedness in this world but beauty is our
consolation prize ….. the beauty of john Coltrane's reedy
voice, it's whispers, it's knowingness, it's sly sexuality, it's
praise of creation.
And so Coltrane began to make sense to me.
I left the music on repeat and I stayed awake listening to a
man facing God with the gift of his music.
—Bono
tuirgin: shishno2: jazz really says
something to you
tuirgin: That piece does.
tuirgin: I don't know how to put it. Hyperbole, but I had the thought
that if I could live inside that song I'd find salvation. Like I said,
hyperbole, but it speaks towards what I really mean.
tuirgin: Santana's silly sentence keeps drifting through my
mind: His tone truly puts demons on a leash.
tuirgin: More Santana:
When you hear this second kind of Coltrane music,
the only way you can describe it is the way you would describe Machu
Picchu in the Andes mountains. It's a whole other level of high
consciousness that causes the slicksters and the hipsters and anyone
else to say,
Hey, this is not coming from an intellectual trip or some dude
trying to show off.
When he starts a solo with his saxophone, it actually sounds
like his heart is made out of light, and it is coming out of the
horn; the horn is rumbling, and all of the keys are shooting off
light.
Coltrane has come the closest to connecting the alpha to the
omega through sound.
tuirgin: It sounds ridiculous. But to me it seems damned
close to ridiculous truth.
shishno2: I'll burn a cd tomorrow of Coltrane.
tuirgin: heh
shishno2: But I don't speak the language, so I dunno if I'll reverb
the way you do.
tuirgin: I asked my dad what he thought. He said, I liked
it…I didn't know what I was listening to, but I liked it.
tuirgin: I said, Knowing doesn't matter.
tuirgin: I didn't have the big response to it the first time I
listened to it. I liked it, but wondered just what the fuss was, but
as I kept listening to it I began to hear it. It went from my ears to
my heart. But it took a lot of listens and time and my own searching
shishno2: Like me and tarkovsky, but thru eyes.
tuirgin: Yeah. That's exactly it. It's nearly impossible to talk about
what T means. But if you're open to it emotionally it will work it's
way into you and devastate you and put you back together
again. Catharsis.
shishno2: Yeah. It just is, when you open up the right way.
tuirgin: Yeah.
tuirgin: Coltrane, like a lot of jazz musicians had the habit of
showing up at the studio having no clue what he'd put down on tape.
He'd compose the songs in the hallways of the studio and take it in
and play it.
tuirgin: But A Love Supreme, he went into a room in the upstairs of
his house. Locked himself in. His wife would bring food up and make
sure he ate something, but nobody went and bothered him—nobody
saw him for like a week.
tuirgin: Finally he comes down—his wife, Alice, says, "Like
Moses comin' off the mountain," and he tells her that for the first
time ever he has all the music. It's done. It was delivered, as it
were, in one week-long sitting.
shishno2: Wow!
tuirgin: He took it to the studio and didn't rehearse it with his
band—he told them what to play and they played it. They had no
idea. No idea that this was a prayer in 4 movements
tuirgin: I just downloaded the only live concert he played of Love
Supreme. In the intereviews Branford brings it up to Alice Coltrane
and says he was shocked when he heard it because no one but Coltrane
knew what he was doing.
tuirgin: The drummer didn't know when to come in, the pianist, the
bass player—they couldn't remember it. And he goes on to say,
the level of players they were, had they played it even twice they'd
have had it memorized. But they didn't.
tuirgin: Which makes the recording all that much more remarkable.
tuirgin: Sorry…going off. :D
shishno2: Nah, that kind of going on I can handle. :)
shishno2: It's not knowing the names of people or anything about them
that gets distracting. But art is a fun listen.
tuirgin: The thing with jazz is that though there's a ton of people to
know about, at the same time they're all inter-related. They all knew
each other and played with each other. So, I'm finding that learning
the names of one quartet then hearing about another that shared a
player, and then another and another.
tuirgin: It's a big web and it feels like a small world.
shishno2: Just like hollywood, sorta.
tuirgin: Not my scene, so I don't really know. Take your word for it.
tuirgin: Something that has been on my mind…let me see if I can
figure out how to relate it…
shishno2: k
tuirgin: Ok…you know how you find a piece of music or art or
whatever and you like it, and you read about the artist and they
totally blow—drug addled, or a mean S.O.B. or this or
that—and it's a bit of a disappointment?
shishno2: Like when I found out Grace Kelly slept with half of
hollywood?
tuirgin: That's starting to turn around for me, somehow. I'm
beginning to be more and more interested in the lives of all these
messed up people. They made beautiful music, but they had really
screwed up lives.
tuirgin: NO WAY!!!!
tuirgin: Damn.
shishno2: Yeah…I know. It was a big letdown.
tuirgin: No shit.
tuirgin: Anyway, there's something really affirmative to me in that
these screwed up people were able to make beautiful music.
shishno2: I know what you mean though…
tuirgin: It's kind of like saying, look, we're all frail, fucked up
people, and that doesn't matter—look at this, my art. And the
art doesn't excuse the baseness of a person's life, but it's like it
says that somewhere they still had a sense of God or their basic human
nature, which is the image of God, at least in my terminology.
shishno2: Sort of like man looks at the outward appearance, but the
lord looks at the heart.
tuirgin: Yeah.
shishno2: And what comes out is more important than what goes in when
it comes to holiness.
tuirgin: If a really fucked up person can make one thing of
beauty… that thing of beauty speaks to the reality that still
exists inside him. It's not the thing of beauty that matters so
much…but it's the thing which shows through to what's still
there.
shishno2: Don't let that backslap you though…at least,
recognize that beauty isn't just in really hard to play jazz prayers.
tuirgin: No, I know. It can be in the simplest thing. The whole art as
religion thing is all wrong.
shishno2: :p I know…but it took me years to get that.
tuirgin: I'm beginning to understand why, whereas I "knew" it was
wrong, but felt like it wasn't. It's not the art…it's the soul
that made the art. Our true art is always the soul
…
tuirgin: A novice goes to a famous old monastery. And his father asks
him what he wants to achieve: theosis, to see the glory of God, to
become love. The father reaches back to his bookshelf and pulls out a
novel of Dickens and hands it to him and says, Read this. You'll
start here.
shishno2: Go figger.
tuirgin: The novice protests that this is Victorian, Western
claptrap. The father says, Until you can love as such and such
character loves, you'll not attain anything greater.
shishno2: Scrooge?
shishno2: :)
tuirgin: heh
tuirgin: Don't remember. I've heard the story several times with
different features.
…
shishno2: It's too easy to pick one trait and bring yourself down to
hell because it doesn't match up to some bar you've set and it's hard
to keep an eye on your life as a whole and not the day to day.
tuirgin: totally
shishno2: They talk about seeing life through the eyes of eternity and
say that it involves living in the moment. That's part of it, the open
part. The other part is seeing all that was and will ever be, and a
lot of that is already written in a book.
tuirgin: Yeah…I still like how Campbell described the eternal
moment—the experience of the particular moment without a sense
of time.
shishno2: I prefer Thomas Wolfe's all the walls that ever
were
as a description of the everlasting in a moment.
tuirgin: Yeah.
shishno2: It's not that this is a brick. It's that this is all bricks
and all the bricks are a wall. But they're every wall.
tuirgin: eternity in a grain of sand, heaven in a
wildflower
shishno2: And the whole thing is one big multi-faceted something, and
seeing your reflection in one facet is wrong. I'm pretty sure every
life, when looked at through every facet, is complex and noble and
nothing to be ashamed of.
tuirgin: I was listening to this new album. Not sure whether to call
it jazz or R&B. But it's got singing. Really fine singing by this
black (presumably) lady with a rich alto voice. The lyrics themselves
are kinda… Well, they'd be really cheezy if it wasn't for her
delivery.
tuirgin: Let me see if I can find the lyrics, though, because there
was a part that really struck me
tuirgin: Damn…it's not popular enough to have the lyrics in a
gazillion places…
shishno2: heh
tuirgin: It's a song called Raining on the Moon.
shishno2: k
shishno2: William Parker Quartet?
tuirgin: And it's a utopian piece, punctured by the chorus
line, it's raining on the moon
.
tuirgin: Yeah.
tuirgin: Anyway, it talks about the righting of all the wrongs in our
country. And this one section talks about all the black, white, and
yellow men that have been lynched being resurrected, and those that
did the lynching apologizing profusely. And those lynched say that
there's nothing to forgive.
tuirgin: And there's the allusion, you know not what you do,
and it continues because if you did you'd be evil…and I
know you're not evil.
It was really powerful to me.
shishno2: It echoes one of
our discussions.
tuirgin: It's talking about some of the worst shit that happened in
our history, but people are so blind that they don't even know how
wrong what they're doing is.
shishno2: About hell being here on earth, and the judgment being
everyone going to their persecutors and forgiving them
tuirgin: Yeah. That convo is on my mind a lot…never totally
leaves it, really.
…
shishno2: I watched this movie, The Weather Man, by myself
last weekend. It's a downer, I don't really recommend it. But the
main guy's dad dies and the movie ends pretty quick after that.
shishno2: The guy repeats what people said about his dad at the
funeral, about how he was all these quality traits that the main guy
wanted to be through his life, but as time went on he kept losing one,
and then another, and another until he ended up who he was, and that
was ok.
shishno2: and i was thinking to myself, Not really!
I mean,
yeah, acceptance is good, you are who you are, but the flick really
gave me the desire to be good, noble, strong, faithful, all these
things that the main guy wasn't, and looking at myself and seeing
how i'm not those things in so many ways was depressing.
shishno2: I just remembered it.
tuirgin: Acceptance is the first step to progress…seeing
ourselves how we really are. I guess that's what repentance is all
about, and not wallowing in being "bad".
shishno2: Well, if you saw that you were bad, and stuck there, you'd
become evil. Usually we realize we're bad and don't want to be bad
anymore, though changing is harder.
shishno2: Being bad is easy: all you have to do is nothing.