| |
| Last night I dreamed that Christopher who is now not going by that name but it kills me to try to call someone a different name arrived here unexpectedly. In the dream I cried and cried and cried - and NOT because I was sad. I wonder if that dream might one day come true? But I'll try not to cry. link
Voice from the past So you called tonight. How long? Six years? It doesn't seem possible. Spur of the moment drives to Leavenworth, arguments in the kitchen, dinners eaten on the floor in front of your computer. Six years ago? More? Unthinkable. Your voice still sounds the same and can still lull me into that same complacency that says let's just drop the important and do the urgent; fly far from here. No, it's awareness into which you lull me. I know how quickly nine months pass and six years of silence take their place. Maybe seven. I haven't yet counted. Long time. I do read. I do lie on the grass and think sometimes. Not often enough, you'd say. Your voice brought back so many good memories. I wish you to return. Tears aren't always bad, young upstart. This post is for you. I raise my glass to you. The contents are unworthy, but the gesture means the same. Here's to you. To you coming home one day. To friendships that do not yield to the pressures of time. To loving forever. To understanding. To your mood not being my responsibility, but my concern. Here's to you. To children being a direct deposit by God Himself into the eternal bank account of our soul. To the means by which they are acquired being a non-issue. To life. Where there's life, there's hope. I will pray that God smiles on you and grants you a speedy end to trouble. God bless you. God bless you. God fill you with hope. God fill you with life. link
C.S. Lewis once gave the advice to never move away from one's friends. Good advice, that. A few simple words from a long-time friend, one who knows me as only a few others do, and the world is disassembled and rearranged. Home is where? A locality? An emotional frame of reference? A state of the heart? It is hard to be out of the presence of those one loves and by whom one is loved, even as one is in the presence of other loves. The heart yearns for home even as one is already home. In this life there is too much division—space and time are too real. Love is made more poignant by loss and longing. And all these words are so much static of the soul, the heart, as interpreted by the mind. There is only one faithful expression of all of this: I sigh. | |
|
| It has been one month since I wrote the exlamation: It is right that our Faith is sung. Holy, Holy, Holy. I have moved no closer to the goal. This month has been filled with business, exhaustion, and sickness. It has also been a time of fighting. [Sitting outside…]God’s grace is like the wind—it gently brushes through the palm fronds. The fronds sound out with their gentle, wooden tinkling. The sound speaks of God's mercy, peace-giving, and blessing. A flock of Ibis—white, so bright—swoop over the pond and land along the pebble gray edge. They casually—but yet attentive—pick out bits of food from between the rocks while others wander out into the sea of grass. The palms stand still—but at ease as the fronds slowly sway from side to side, in a dance with the breeze—God’s breath. ( pnuema, spirit, wind) When it storms the wind rushes through these same fronds with a furious violence. God is not quite safe. But He is Love. And He is Good. | |
|
| I have been thinking a little—more or less at the back of my mind—about the human need for a pattern, a frame of reference. 
For a period of about two years I read mythology exclusively. Some of it I received through the “interpretation” of Joseph Campbell, but quite a bit of it directly. It seemed that the more mythology I read, the more common little events of every day would register an association with these mythologies. ( Read more... )- Tags:
association, boris pasternak, christianity, culture, george macdonald, james joyce, joseph campbell, mythology, rumination, st. ephrem the syrian, w.b. yeats
| |
|
| Various winding thoughts about Yeats, The labyrinth of my days, and the allure of The Peacock. At times in one’s life it seems that for some few moments the past and the future forcibly confront the present. The state of the present and recent past largely influence whether these occassions are met with nostalghia and dread or become a fertile budding of creative force. Friday marks the beginning of one such occassion and I am wavering in my response. ( Read more... ) | |
|
| Dear X— (and J— and R—, whom I’m cc’ing), Your quick comment on my poetry has kind of sparked me. Yes, I suppose it IS what I have chosen. And yet, I am very fearful of never writing anything really worthwhile. I have this impression of the great writers as intellectual giants which cannot be met. And I have an impression of the current practitioners being an in-crowd full of allusions and inner-knowledge. And me, a college drop-out, who burns all candles at every end, burning quickly, smoky, short-lived. I picked up a writer’s magazine today. Nothing too high-brow, I think, and yet it is full of assumption and jargon. Names bandied, laced, and strewn. ( Read more... ) | |
|
| It looks like two of Anastasia’s top teeth are beginning to come in. Her front bottom teeth came in without much fuss. A little bit of Orajel and some cold teething rings did the trick. These top ones seem to be hurting her more. As I try to help by holding her, applying the Orajel, or giving her something cold to numb the pain she writhes in pain and anger, screaming, crying, with tears running down her face. I just try to hold her still, to quiet her. God must see us something like this—fighting against the very things that will bring comfort to the pain which is either a result of our own actions or a result of our very nature. ( Read more... ) | |
|
| To A Mouse. On turning her up in her nest with the plough, November 1785A Poem by Robert BurnsThis poem was just the thing I wanted. I get so caught up in thinking, but finally something gets my attention and speaks to my heart more than my head. It's as if in answer to my questioning, "What is an artist? What is art?" I am given this verse—" This is art." In reading these verses I am reminded of another Scot... George MacDonald. I cannot help but feel that this man tilled the ground of my heart, preparing it for the beauty of Orthodoxy.
One more note... I must relate everything back to how I must live my life within a family—the family of the church, but also more specifically in my own family of flesh and blood. Theory is meaningless in dusty, unlived corners. Everything resolves back to the life of Communion and theosis otherwise it is merely sounding brass or a tinkling cymbal
I've been thinking about art and responsibilities—what is the responsibility of the artist; of the audience? In thinking about this I have tried to apply what I know of Orthodox art. At some point, however, there is a disconnect because an Orthodox "artist" is not so much an artist as he is a prophet—not in the foretelling, but in the forthtelling sense. Still, the tradition of the iconographer may prove to be a good example, useful for establishing the foundation upon which may be built the answer to my question. An iconographer is not allowed any room for individualism, his forms must agree with what has been established by the Church. And his entire work is done with the concentration and focus of prayer. The iconographer is blessed with a tremendous responsibility before God and the Body of Christ, the Church. At the same time, the Church—both the clergy and the laity—has a responsibility to the iconographer. It must accept or reject what the iconographer offers. It must know itself, it's teachings, it's Tradition and it must constantly engage itself in iconography and theology to ensure that it is healthy and complete, without the poison of individual interpretation or subtle and inappropriate alliances with the "spirit of the age", the Zeitgeist. But these responsibilities are not held one against the other, for the Church is one Body. The iconographer may be the left hand of the Body, the theologians being the right, the laity the feet, with Christ as the most glorious Head—all are joined by the Head in the Heart. The icon finds its fulfilment by the Communion of all parts of the Body—nothing is separate, nothing is in conflict. When the Church rejects a work as being unworthy, it is that which is flawed which is rejected and not the valid iconography. If anything is rejected it is not the iconographer, the person, that is rejected, but that which fails to be a true expression of that personhood which is in Communion with Christ and His Body. But how might this be applied to the arts? I will have to write about this later. | |
|
| Monica and I were talking on Friday about things that we wanted to do before dying. Ten years ago I would have—and did—think in terms of activities: traveling, white water rafting, etc—adventure seeking. Now I realize that I have one real goal which I have been toying with for years—I want to write a book, and not just any book, but a novel, or better yet, a poem, such as Gogol's Dead Souls. ( Read more... ) | |
|
| :: from an e-mail to a friend on 2002.9.30 ::J—, I left work today with a headache. But instead of staying at home I went to the library to pick up my reserved copy of Battleship Potemkin and a video series on the Byzantine Empire. I got to the library before they opened and so went to Barnes & Noble for some coffee. I sat and read Anton Chekhov's The Lady with the Dog. Reading Doctor Zhivago I feel that *awakening* sensation, wherein I see things differently, feel them more alive, but as a subject, an art, and not merely machinery. I am realizing that I have been mostly dead, and that the sign and cause of death is didacticism. It is so easy to choke out the life which Christ offers us. DZ is an important work for me at this moment. LD struck me deeply, too. Have you read it? Why is adultery such a common topic? It is a fearful one. It is one which threatens me with madness. There is something to this—I feel it but it has not come to surface, yet—it is still too deep, too much in the subconscious. I feel almost as if God and Satan are at once whispering the same words to me--it is the tone of voice which makes the difference, which holds completely different implications. We cannot judge. To judge is to damn ourselves. The Gospels say as much. But I think I'm learning this at a more personal level. It is not just that we are guilty of hypocrisy, but that our judgement causes us to commit that very thing. I cannot say what this passage does in me. Just read it and perhaps you will know it, too. At Oreanda they sat on a seat not far from the church, looked down at the sea, and were silent. Yalta was hardly visible through the morning mist; white clouds stood motionless on the mountain-tops. The leaves did not stir on the trees, grasshoppers chirruped, and the monotonous hollow sound of the sea rising up from below, spoke of the peace, of the eternal sleep awaiting us. So it must have sounded when there was no Yalta, no Oreanda here; so it sounds now, and it will sound as indifferently and monotonously when we are all no more. And in this constancy, in this complete indifference to the life and death of each of us, there lies hid, perhaps, a pledge of our eternal salvation, of the unceasing movement of life upon earth, of unceasing progress towards perfection. Sitting beside a young woman who in the dawn seemed so lovely, soothed and spellbound in these magical surroundings—the sea, mountains, clouds, the open sky—Gurov thought how in reality everything is beautiful in this world when one reflects: everything except what we think or do ourselves when we forget our human dignity and the higher aims of our existence.
And then, the end... In moments of depression in the past he had comforted himself with any arguments that came into his mind, but now he no longer cared for arguments; he felt profound compassion, he wanted to be sincere and tender... "Don't cry, my darling," he said. "You've had your cry; that's enough... Let us talk now, let us think of some plan." Then they spent a long while taking counsel together, talked of how to avoid the necessity for secrecy, for deception, for living in different towns and not seeing each other for long at a time. How could they be free from this intolerable bondage? "How? How?" he asked, clutching his head. "How?" And it seemed as though in a little while the solution would be found, and then a new and splendid life would begin; and it was clear to both of them that they had still a long, long road before them, and that the most complicated and difficult part of it was only just beginning.
Do we torture ourselves to remind us how miserable we really are? What person is really convinced that some affair will bring happiness? As with Tristan and Iseult, it is Death... a sickness which we do not want to let go of. And yet, somewhere, somewhere here I sense Christ working in His infinite mercy and love. Have you ever thought that all the truly great characters who live out a life of charity—I'm thinking of Les Miserables, Tarkovsky's Rublev, Crime & Punishment—debase themselves in some way, realize their wretchedness and their response is to do good. I was thinking today that they do not do good in the hopes of saving themselves, or of making up for what they have done, but that to them there is nothing left for them to do but either destroy themselves in death or to become a living crucification of love... not a work nor a necessary task, but that it becomes the only breath given them. | |
|
|